10 most botched Android device launches ever

Hindsight is 20/20, but these launches were screwed up badly.

botched launches main
Ryan Whitwam

Sometimes a phone stands out for all the wrong reasons

There are plenty of Android phones and tablets that sound good on paper, but the experience is not all it’s cracked up to be once you get them in your hands. With so many manufacturers trying all sorts of wacky things and pushing the envelope to stand out, you’re bound to the occasional failure to launch. Maybe the pricing was bad, or perhaps the “killer feature” wasn’t so killer. Here are 10 Android devices with absolutely botched launches from which they could never recover.

botched launches xoom

Motorola Xoom 4G LTE

The Motorola Xoom was the first “real” Android tablet. While the Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.0 beat it to market, the Xoom ran Android Honeycomb and was optimized for a larger form factor. There were  plenty of issues with the Xoom and Honeycomb, but it served its purpose to show what Android was like on a larger device. The LTE variant, on the other hand, was a complete mess. This device cost a whopping $800, which was $200 more than the Wi-Fi only Xoom. For that added money you got no LTE—just the promise of a future upgrade.

There was no LTE hardware in the Xoom, which was very new for Verizon at the time. Instead, buyers were told they’d be able to upgrade their device to support LTE in the coming weeks. That ended up stretching into months. Update didn’t become available until seven months after the device launched. You had to factory reset your tablet and send it away for Verizon to install the LTE modem, which took about a week. As you can imagine, sales of the LTE Xoom were pretty bad. Don’t promise what you can’t deliver.

botched launches watch urbane 2

LG Watch Urbane 2nd Edition

The Android Wear 1.4 upgrade was a big one with support for speakers, more gestures, LTE, and voice messaging. The LG Watch Urbane 2nd Edition was supposed to be the flagship Android Wear watch to show those features off when it launched in late 2015. Then, LG ran into a little issue. Only a few weeks after Verizon and AT&T started selling the Watch Urbane 2, LG had to recall the watch because of a hardware defect (it turned out to be the display).

The Watch Urbane 2 was delayed indefinitely while LG worked on a fix. The company didn't even offer a timeline, which was a big mistake. Many potential buyers assumed the watch was gone for good. Naturally, when the watch did go back on sale in mid-2016 there were not many buyers still interested. Android Wear was in a lull at that point, in part because the Urbane 2 left a gap in Google's smartwatch lineup.

botched launches note 7

Samsung Galaxy Note7

The mess surrounding the release of the Samsung Galaxy Note7 is quickly becoming legendary as Samsung tries to pick up the pieces from what was supposed to be its most successful phone launch ever. The Note7 launched in the fall of 2016 to rave reviews, but it became apparent the battery was failing and catching fire at an alarming rate. Okay, so a recall. The problem: Samsung got the recall underway so fast that it didn't have time to properly test the new batteries. It just really, really wanted to get the Note7 back on shelves. When the replacement Note7 devices showed a propensity to explode as well, Samsung pulled the plug permanently.

The company eventually released its findings from a months-long investigation of the incident. It found that the shape of the first battery caused negative electrodes to be bent inward where they came in contact with the positive ones and shorted out. The second batteries also suffered a positive-negative short, but this one was caused by welding burrs. If Samsung had taken a little more time to investigate and test after the first recall, there might still be a Galaxy Note7 on the market today.

botched launches nexus 4

Google Nexus 4

Google never really took the Nexus phones seriously, and that was particularly apparent with the release of the Nexus 4. If you thought the last few Google phones had supply problems, you must not remember the Nexus 4. This device garnered huge interest with the low $300 starting price. The available stock sold out within minutes of going on sale, which isn't completely unheard of. However, Google then realized it sold too many devices and started delaying orders indefinitely.

The Nexus 4 was almost impossible to find for months after its release, and even when you got one it didn't have LTE… or did it? It turns out the antenna was able to connect to LTE even without the right signal amplifier. Just as people were starting to get excited about the secret LTE, Google issued an update to lock LTE in the radio firmware. It didn't really have a choice as the device wasn't certified for LTE by regulators. Still, it was just another thing that annoyed people who had already dealt with the messy launch to get a phone.

botched launches droid bionic

Motorola Droid Bionic

The Droid Bionic was demoed at CES in 2011, where it was supposed to usher in the era of dual-core Android smartphones with LTE. Then it just didn't come out. Motorola remained mum on the Bionic for months, then it finally came out in fall of 2011. However, it wasn't really the Bionic. Sure, Verizon and Motorola called it the "Bionic," but the phone that launched bore little resemblance to the original Bionic.

The delays caused by the redesign resulted in the Bionic missing its window. The Galaxy S2 was released over the summer, and the Droid Razr was heavily rumored over the fall, as was the Galaxy Nexus LTE. Those phones ended up launching right after the Bionic, effectively killing any momentum that phone would have had. It was poor planning all around. Verizon and Motorola should have just canned the Bionic when it became clear there was no space in the lineup.

botched launches htc first

HTC First

Facebook was often cited as a potential competitor in smartphones as Android started to take off, but when the Facebook phone finally happened it was running Android. It was also a spectacular disaster. The HTC First came at a time in 2013 when HTC's hardware efforts (especially cameras) were faltering, and the software didn't do it any favors. The Facebook Home interface was something of a mess. It was based heavily on your Facebook feed, and there's probably a lot of garbage in your feed.

With the right pricing, a device like the HTC First might have had a shot, but that's not what we got. It was exclusive to AT&T, which insisted on a $99 on-contract price (it was hundreds of dollars more without one). AT&T reportedly only sold a few thousand units during the first few months, at which time it dropped the price to $0.99 on-contract. Maybe that was the right price in the first place, but this instantly kicked off a new round of coverage on the phone's failure. It was over for the First at that point.

botched launches galaxy tab 7.0

Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.0

Samsung was riding high on the success of the Galaxy S in late 2010 when it decided to go after the recently released iPad. It really could not have picked a worse time to do it, though. The Galaxy Tab 7.0 was the first Android tablet from an established OEM, but it ran Android 2.2 Froyo at launch. It didn't work well on tablets at all.

Gingerbread came out almost the same time as the Galaxy Tab shipped, and Google unveiled Honeycomb a mere two months later. Despite its flaws, this was a version of Android properly optimized for tablets. It made the Galaxy Tab 7.0 look hideously rushed and doomed it to failure. The $400 price tag also seemed high for something that was essentially a large and poorly optimized phone. If Samsung had just cooled its jets and waited a few months, it could have started its tablet plans off on the right foot.

botched launches lg g5


The LG G5 doesn’t seem bad on paper—Snapdragon 820, quad HD screen, and a removable battery. The problem was LG’s attempt to carve out a new modular phone category. The LG G5 had a chin that popped off to allow users to connect modular accessories. It wasn’t the most compelling feature, but the real problem was the almost complete lack of modules. The modular design also required design compromises that made the phone feel cheap compared to the competition.

In all, LG released two modules for the G5; a camera grip and a HiFi DAC. The HiFi wasn’t even released in the U.S., and let’s face it, the camera grip was a terrible idea. So, the launch modules stank, and things didn’t get any better because LG never released any more of them. At the end of the day, even LG had to admit the G5 was a flop as it reorganized its mobile division over the summer of 2016. If it wanted to do a modular phone it should have actually had some good ideas for modules ready to go.

botched launches galaxy nexus lte

Galaxy Nexus LTE

The Galaxy Nexus was the first phone to run Android 4.0, which was the most significant update Android had ever seen up to that point. One big problem—the Galaxy Nexus was exclusive to Verizon in the US as a special LTE variant. Verizon was so excited about the device that it didn’t carry a version of the Samsung Galaxy SII that year. The launch got off to an inauspicious start with a month long delay, then it only got worse.

The Galaxy Nexus was over $700 off-contract and $300 on-contract when it launched in late 2011. Right from the start updates were slow compared to the international device, which annoyed the Nexus fans who switched to Verizon to get the phone. Battery life was also worsened by the first few updates. The final nail in the coffin was Google’s release of the unlocked Galaxy Nexus on the Play Store in April 2012 for $399, just over half the cost of Verizon’s version. Verizon didn’t benefit much from just a few months of exclusivity, but that was long enough to permanently hobble the Gnex in the US. Everyone lost on this one.

botched launches fire phone

Amazon Fire Phone

By the summer of 2014, Amazon had been selling Android tablets with moderate success for years. Bezos and company decided to throw a phone into the mix, but the Fire Phone made just about every mistake it was possible to make right out of the gate.

The “killer feature” was Dynamic Perspective head-tracking tech, which was little more than a tech demo. There weren’t enough apps and games available to take advantage of it. There weren’t even enough apps and games in general because the Fire Phone had no Google apps. That was something consumers put up with on cheap tablets, but not an expensive phone. How expensive? It was $650 off-contract and was exclusive to AT&T where it was $200 with a contract. None of that was a good idea. The phone was eventually sold unlocked for as little as $130 to clear stock. The Fire Phone might have had a shot if pricing and availability had been more in-line with the Fire tablets.

Top Deals On Great Products

Picked by Techconnect's Editors

Related Slideshows