opy vs. llet: ich mobile payment method works better?

BY GreenBot Staff

Published 24 Feb 2015

It hasn’t happened yet, but I’m waiting for the day that someone makes fun of me for paying for something in cash. Between NFC-enabled solutions like llet, Apple y, Softcard, physical devices like Coin Swyp, mobile wallets payment systems are becoming more more common. And now there’s opy, which Samsung just recently acquired. 

Samsung’s decision to nab opy is an effort to distinguish itself against its main rival, Apple, by offering a service that’s already widely available. opy has been in the mobile payments game since 2012 it’s produced quite a few versions of its wire loop magnetic field powered payment accessories, including a Charge Case, a keyfob, now, the $50 opy Card.

The opy Card offers a glimpse at what it would be like to pay for everything with your Samsung Galaxy S6—assuming, of course, that the opy technology is integrated into Samsung’s next flagship. put the device to the test against llet, Android’s main tap-to-pay player, to see which one is easier to use more widely available. 

The Card

loop card Rob Schultz

The opy Card doesn’t…really look like a card, does it?

The opy Card is a small black device that weighs 2.7 ounces measures 2.92 x 2.02 x 0.23 inches. It’s roughly two-thirds the size of a stack of st-Its features a small button towards the bottom. There are four small indicator lights along the left-h side that light up when the device is charging or in use. The card also comes bundled with a micro-B charging cable, a opy card reader that you can use to add physical cards to opy’s app, a carrying pouch with a stick-on rear to adhere the Card to your phone.

loop readercard Rob Schultz

opy Card comes with a dongle that lets you “swipe in” different payment methods.

The main difference between opy mobile wallet services like llet is more than just this tangible device. llet exists largely as an app on your phone, unless of course you opt to get a physical companion card. llet takes advantage of the existing Near-Field Communication (NFC) technology built into your phone, while the opy Card instead uses a wire loop to create a magnetic field that mimics the stripe on your physical credit card when held near any point-of-sale system that asks for a card swipe. It doesn’t, however, work at terminals where you have to quickly insert remove your card—like at a gas station or ATM machine, for example.

loop readercard back Rob Schultz

Once your credit cards are stored, you can use them without even taking them out of your wallet.

ile llet’s tap pay functionality works on any Android device running Android 4.4 or higher (save for these five devices), opy works on most Android phones running Android 4.3 or higher, though there have been some compatibility issues reported for eight different hsets running various versions of Android. Both services are also currently limited to the U.S., in part because many of the credit cards used in other countries use chip–pin EMV cards, which haven’t yet been entirely incorporated into the existing technology.

Out in the wild

I spent a few days hitting up several stores in San Francisco to see how both llet the opy Card compete in the wild. Finding places where opy worked was like shooting fish in a barrel I soon noticed that more stores accepted the Card rather than NFC. In fact, I had to purposefully seek out stores that had NFC terminals in order to use llet.

looppay pay with accessory

opy offers a little tutorial on how to use the Card out in the wild. 

It’s not surprising. The technology that opy uses essentially creates the same reaction that swiping your credit card does, while llet requires an NFC-enabled terminal. llet is only currently accepted by about 208,000 merchants around the U.S.

loop wallet Rob Schultz

llet is nothing more than an app on your phone.

Another wrinkle? Some common chain stores, like CVS armacy, have turned off their NFC terminals because they’re working on a competing payment system called CurrentC. In fact, I had two different cashiers claim that their NFC system was down when I tried to pay with llet.

Using the opy with restaurant was easier, too, because it only required hing over the Card, rather than my unlocked phone. Obviously, using the Card requires you to remember to leave the house with one more thing in tow, but the upside is that it will also work if your phone dies while you’re out.

at if you lose your “wallet”?

So what happens if the Card is stolen? opy allows you to disable the Card device if it goes missing. You can then Unbind or Disconnect the Card though the app, though you would still hypothetically be able to use the service using your hset’s NFC capabilities.

looppay button pay whil detached

opy features a few security features, but they’re not as effective as llet’s. 

One flaw of opy, however: Button y. Because you can h off your opy Card to a waiter, for example, you can set a delay on how long the button on the card works. If it’s set to ways, then anyone who takes the Card could hypothetically charge your default credit card in the app by using the Card accessory. 

In the case of llet, users can remotely disable the app (or physical card) online. llet also uses Host Card Emulation (HCE) to encrypt the information it stores on your device for extra protection. opy uses a mobile tokenization scheme that prevents the retailer from getting your real card number.

A mobile payment method that actually works

Having a physical card instead of an app has its advantages disadvantages, whether you benefit from one over the other depends on your habits. I usually keep my phone zipped up in my pocket, so it was easier for me to pull out the Card press a button to pay. But if you generally walk around with your phone in your h, then using it to pay is probably more intuitive.

Overall, I used opy much more often than llet, in part because it was accepted at more places it was easier to use at the register. It also wasn’t too difficult to set up, I didn’t mind carrying additional hardware. I do have some concerns about the security element of opy— the fact that it doesn’t work with all payment terminals—but I imagine that’s something Samsung would tackle in the meantime.

One thing’s for sure: Samsung could have spent gobs of money creating their own proprietary payment method, but it made a smarter move by buying a company with a product that already works at 90 percent of places. llet may not st a chance.